Code size than typical BEAM languages.
Execution speed unknown so far.
Opportunities: No hot code loading -> Optimization possibilities, space saving (dead code elimination), ongoing discussions: native code generation, NX style, LLM models.
Offline mode: There is a lot of potential.
BEAM’s selling point: How batte-tested it is. 30 years of production world stuff.
Firefly’s selling point: Augmented extend in Web apps and IoT.
Compilers etc… Spinning in wheels…. ordering problem… smaller pieces… iterate…
“I never knew where I was in terms of the total progress.”
We have been looking for a product owner for the R&D department and it have been struggle because most managers that have traditional product manager training are a fit here because sometimes you have to try something else on the way. (…) It’s a nightmare, it’s impossible. And your most managers want: Well, let’s come up with estimations, let’s hold your feet to the fire*. That’s not the way software development can go. There has to be an allowence on experimentation, allowence on trial…
No clear answers sometimes…
* Pressure someone to consent to or undertake something.